You do not need a code audit because you are paranoid. You need one because something is already broken and you cannot tell whether the fix is $5,000 or $50,000. These are the situations where founders call us.
You acquired a company, hired a new CTO, or took over a project from another agency. The code runs but nobody understands it. You need an independent assessment before committing budget.
Every fix introduces two new issues. Crash rates are climbing. Your developer says "it is just technical debt" but cannot explain why features that worked last month do not work today.
The relationship ended. You have source code in a repo you cannot evaluate yourself. Before hiring the next team, you need to know whether this code is fixable or needs to be rebuilt from scratch.
The app is slow. Users are complaining. App Store reviews mention lag, crashes, or battery drain. Your current team says they need "more time" but cannot quantify what is wrong.
An investor or acquirer asked for a technical assessment. You need an independent third-party code review that documents architecture quality, security posture, and scalability ceiling.
Your app was built with proprietary tools, uncommon frameworks, or patterns that make it expensive to hire for. You want to know: can we migrate, or are we trapped?
A 15-30 page document written for a non-technical founder — not a dump of linting errors. Every finding is severity-ranked and paired with a cost estimate.
How is the app structured? Is the architecture scalable? Are there patterns that will break at 10x or 100x users? We grade the overall architecture A through F with specific reasoning.
Every bug, security flaw, performance bottleneck, and code smell — ranked Critical / High / Medium / Low. Critical means "this can take down your app or leak data." Low means "fix when convenient."
API key exposure, insecure storage, unencrypted transmission, authentication flaws, injection vulnerabilities. We check OWASP Mobile Top 10 and document every finding with reproduction steps.
The question every founder asks: "Can this be saved, or do we start over?" We give a direct answer with cost estimates for both paths. Fix this module ($X), rewrite that one ($Y), total rescue estimate ($Z).
Startup time, frame rate, memory usage, API response times, battery impact. We measure against platform standards (60fps, sub-2s cold start) and flag every metric that fails.
A sequenced list: fix these 3 critical items first ($X, 2 weeks), then these 5 high items ($Y, 4 weeks), then these medium items ($Z, ongoing). You walk away knowing exactly what to spend and when.
1
You share repo access (GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket). We sign an NDA. You tell us what hurts most. 30-minute kickoff call with a co-founder.
2
3-4 days of hands-on code review. We build the app locally, run it, trace critical paths, profile performance, scan for security flaws.
3
We write the full audit document. Plain language. Severity rankings. Fix estimates. Architecture grade. Fix-or-rebuild verdict.
4
60-minute video call where we walk you through every finding. You ask questions. We prioritize together. You decide next steps.
Fixed-bid. You know the cost before you commit. No surprise invoices.
$2,997
$4,997
$14,997+
Codebases over 100K lines of code may require a custom quote. We will tell you on the intake call.
5 business days from the moment we receive repo access. Larger codebases (100K+ lines) may take 7-10 days — we will tell you on the intake call before you pay.
No. We work from source code only. We build the app locally, run it against staging or mock data. We do not touch production databases, servers, or user data.
Then the audit just saved you months of patching a sinking ship. You have a clear document to show investors, co-founders, or your board explaining why the rebuild is necessary. If you want us to do the rebuild, the $2,997 audit fee is credited toward the Full Rescue tier.
Yes. The report is yours. Use it to brief your next agency, your in-house hire, or your CTO. We write it to be actionable for any competent engineering team — not just us.
We audit exported or generated code from FlutterFlow, Bubble (exported), Adalo, and similar tools. If the platform does not export source code, we can do a functional audit (UX, performance, API) instead of a code-level review. Same price, different deliverable format.
We have never delivered an audit that found nothing. Every codebase has issues. But if we somehow cannot deliver meaningful findings, we refund the full $2,997. That has not happened yet.
Have a game-changing app idea? Let Appverra bring it to life with powerful, scalable, and beautifully designed Flutter apps tailored to your vision, goals, and users.